AI coding assistant with deep codebase-wide context and search.
A paid AI coding assistant centered on codebase-wide context, search, autocomplete, and agent-style work.
Independent analysis based on official public sources (pricing pages, documentation, release notes) — not a sponsored review or a hands-on test.
AI coding assistant with deep codebase-wide context and search.
Sourcegraph Cody is a paid product, with plans starting at $59 per month (monthly billing).
Sourcegraph Cody is one of 41 AI Coding tools tracked on ToolScanner. You can compare it side by side with alternatives, check verified monthly-billing prices, and add it to your AI stack to see what your whole setup costs.
Cody is described as an AI coding assistant built around deep context across a codebase.
Search is a core part of the product’s stated workflow for finding relevant code context.
Autocomplete is listed as an available feature.
Agent mode is listed as an available feature for more task-oriented assistance.
Cody is positioned around deep codebase-wide context and search, which is most relevant when local-file suggestions alone are not enough.
Its combination of search, autocomplete, and agent mode makes it a fit for workflows that begin with understanding existing code.
Sourcegraph Cody starts at $59 per month and does not offer a free plan or free trial, so it is a considered purchase rather than a casual no-cost experiment.
Cody’s stated emphasis on deep context across a codebase is its clearest distinction for repository-level questions and discovery.
Search is presented alongside AI assistance, which can matter when developers need to locate relevant implementation context before changing code.
The available feature information lists autocomplete and agent mode, covering quick coding assistance as well as more directed task workflows.
The listed starting price is $59 per month, substantially raising the bar for individual developers and small teams assessing value.
There is no free plan and no free trial listed, so prospective buyers cannot rely on an official no-cost evaluation path.
For simple projects or developers seeking only inline completion, Cody’s codebase-context emphasis may be more than the workflow requires.
Use codebase-wide context and search when onboarding to an existing service or tracing where a behavior is implemented.
Use Cody to investigate relevant code and dependencies before proposing a change in a larger repository.
Use autocomplete for routine coding and agent mode when a task calls for more than a single inline suggestion.
Sourcegraph Cody starts at $59 per month.
The product is paid only according to the available plan information: no free plan and no free trial are listed.
At this price, the strongest buying case is a workflow where codebase-wide context and search are materially useful, not merely a desire for basic completion. Confirm current terms on Sourcegraph’s pricing page before purchasing.
No free plan is listed for Sourcegraph Cody.
No free trial is listed.
Cody’s stated positioning puts deep codebase-wide context and search at the center of the workflow; choose it when repository understanding is the deciding requirement rather than primarily inline suggestions in an existing editor.
Prefer Cody when codebase-wide search and context are the priority. Prefer JetBrains AI Assistant when the deciding factor is an AI assistant aligned with a JetBrains-based development workflow.
Cody is a paid product with no listed free tier or trial; Cline is the more practical alternative for buyers who need a free starting point before committing to an AI coding workflow.
Other tools in the same category.
AI coding assistant built into JetBrains IDEs.
Best for coding app for developers
AI code completion tool that can run fully on your own infrastructure.
AI-powered code editor with agentic coding workflows.
Open-source AI coding agent that can edit files and run terminal commands.
Best for coding app for developers
High-performance code editor with built-in AI coding assistance.
GitHub's AI pair programmer for code completion inside your editor.
Best for Autocomplete inside your existing editor
Prefer GitHub Copilot when your main goal is quick inline code suggestions inside an existing editor, especially for a team already working on GitHub.
Prefer JetBrains AI Assistant when developers primarily work in JetBrains IDEs and want their AI assistance centered in that coding environment.
Prefer Windsurf when a free plan is important for initial evaluation or when you want to compare an alternative AI coding workflow before committing to a paid-only product.
Prefer Cline when a no-cost entry point is essential and you want to begin evaluating an AI code editor workflow without a subscription commitment.
The factual claims above (pricing, plans, features, platforms, limits) were checked against these official sources on the dates shown. Vendors change plans at any time — always confirm on the official site before purchasing.
It is best suited to developers and teams that need AI assistance grounded in broad repository context, particularly when finding and understanding existing code is a frequent part of the job.
No free plan and no free trial are listed.
Its stated offering includes deep codebase-wide context, search, and agent mode in addition to autocomplete.
Usually not as the first choice from a value perspective: its $59 monthly starting price is easier to justify when codebase-wide context and search are central to the workflow.
No — Sourcegraph Cody is a paid product.
Paid plans start at $59 per month on a monthly-billing basis (last verified 2026-07-23). Annual billing, higher tiers, and regional pricing can differ.
No free trial is listed for Sourcegraph Cody.
AI coding assistant with deep codebase-wide context and search. On ToolScanner, Sourcegraph Cody is listed under AI Coding.
Popular AI Coding alternatives include JetBrains AI Assistant, Tabnine, Windsurf, Cline, Zed. You can compare any of them with Sourcegraph Cody side by side on ToolScanner.
On the official website — providers change prices and plans at any time, so always confirm there before purchasing. ToolScanner shows the monthly-billing price as of our last check (last verified 2026-07-23).